Outside The Box - Vault's Vision vs. Reality:


Hey, Reader, it's Jerome -

Blake's Vault

The conversation around artists’ revenue has been going on for over a decade. The last few weeks were not left apart. James Blake took the hot seat, believing he has the solution.

Introducing Vault, a subscription-based app to access the artist’s unreleased music.

But wait.

Haven’t platforms like Patreon been offering a similar model for years? Yet, this is not going to save music.

Behind the curtain, Vault is another initiative of Sound.XYZ, mainly known for its music NFT platform.

Let’s consider Kevin Kelly’s ‘1000 True Fans’ concept.

An interesting approach for artists, promising a considerate sum from a relatively small fanbase. But let’s be honest, achieving a loyal following is not a small feat.

James Blake is not any artist. With his success and extensive catalog, Vault offers him a sustainable model.

But is it viable for any indie artist?

The subscriber model intensifies the pressure on artists to keep putting out content. With Vault, the expectation for unreleased music could unfortunately prioritize quantity over quality, a doubting idea for some.

From a fan's perspective, the exclusivity might draw some in. But be aware of the upcoming battle of unreleased songs, with artists battling to keep as many fans subscribed.

While $5 seems small, the costs can quickly accumulate for fans supporting dozens of artists. Spotify and its $15 a month might be seen as a more economical choice.

Direct subscriptions open up a crucial conversation on artist revenue.
However, the model's success relies on many factors beyond the direct influence of artists. This might be more of a trend than a transformation.

The conversation on artist revenue models is far from over. As the landscape evolves, so too must our approaches to supporting the creators behind the music we love. Maybe the future lies not in a single solution but in a mosaic of new ideas.

Best,

Jerome

Recent Release

"Love Bomb by Brooke"

Got on this one last minute. The producer initially mixed the record but wasn’t happy with how it turned out.

So about three weeks ago he asked if I could get the mix done in 3 days.

The thing here was the artist approved the final already.

So the bulk of the work was: 1. to stay close to the original mix the producer had done. 2. fix the problems I could hear in his mix. 3. add my mixing touch.

Even if in the end, we had a big difference between the two mixes.
Everything the artist loved in the OG mix, was still there.

Let's Exchange Notes

Got insights or cool finds in music, innovation, or entrepreneurship?
I'd love to hear about them. Send over your tips!

Forwarded this email? SignUp Here

115w 4th st , Los Angeles, CA 90802
Unsubscribe · Preferences

Jerome Renard

I am passionate about creating unique moments in music, as well as new experiences, tech, coffee and food. Subscribe to my newsletter to receive some of thoughts, insights, behind the life, and a bunch of other stuff!

Read more from Jerome Renard

Hey, Reader, it's Jerome - ↓ Language & Mixing We don't often think about it, but the language of the lyrics influences how I mix a song.Let me explain.The lead vocal is one of the most important elements in a song.But, our perception of different languages changes --Each has unique characteristics. I learned early on that different languages have different intelligibility criteria.Let's take a cliché: the French are loud.What's behind this is that the French language needs a higher volume to...

Hey, Reader, it's Jerome - ↓ AI on the front wall of UMG Deep fakes threaten artists' successes, and AI stands prominently at UMG's forefront. Seems like we've been warned about a lot of what’s been happening lately. And of course, we're only starting to measure against growing AIs. To cite a few: The Taylor Deep Fake saga raging on X UMG's new marketing strategy heavily involves AI tools Majors & Governments passing laws against AI-generated music We could continue with these examples, but I...

Hey, Reader, it's Jerome - ↓ Is it the end of the industry? A bold question, I know. In recent months, the music industry has been undergoing massive shifts. Giants like Sony and Warner have initiated massive layoffs, and most recently UMG announced a workforce reduction of 40%. This brings many talented professionals into the market, sparking a mix of concern and speculation about the future. So, what does this mean for the industry in general, for artists, and its ecosystem as we know it?...